Linktipp: sofaschmöker.de.

Archiv für September 2008

The mixer

This week we just can’t ignore the most dis­cussed new ger­man twit­ter user: It’s the Secretary-General of the ger­man party SPD, Huber­tus Heil. He used twit­ter dur­ing his visit in the United States, where he attended the Obama show in Den­ver. There are quite inter­est­ing neg­a­tive and pos­i­tive reac­tions to this new hobby of Mr. Heil. You can find these reac­tions in twit­ter and in an arti­cle of the ger­man lifestyle mag­a­zine
Der Spiegel.

It’s a cor­rect esti­ma­tion to say that some­times you’ll be crit­i­cized imme­di­ately if you do some­thing for get­ting pub­lic­ity. You can see the arti­cle in Der Spiegel quite easy­ily as that of kind of crit­i­cism. But not every crit­i­cism that comes up quickly is intrin­si­cally wrong.

We don’t mind politi­cians doing things that nor­mal cit­i­zens do as well. We do mind if they’re just pre­tend­ing to do so. It’s one char­ac­ter­is­tic of the polit­i­cal strat­egy of Obama, Heil’s idol and rea­son to come to Den­ver, to make clear he’s not that kind of faker. Believe it or not. In Amer­ica the media don’t believe that com­pletely and there­for they’re talk­ing about play­ing cards.

One thing that is crys­tal clear is that Heil’s show­ing up on twit­ter was planned as a part of his polit­i­cal actions. You can see that in one of the deleted tweets of his account:

Most irri­tat­ing this plan did not result in pre­sent­ing any own polit­i­cal idea. It also sounds like this whole action wasn’t his own idea. And though twit­ter is much about pre­tend­ing and the idea that there is no non­con­for­mity of tweets, because these belong to the sub­jec­tive man­ner to describe real­ity, Heil is def­i­nitely a can­di­date for TMI to us.

This is so because Heil con­tin­u­ously mixes pri­vate, jour­nal­is­tic and polit­cal stuff in his tweets. It’s not clear if he wants to be on twit­ter as a pri­vate man, a politi­cian or a jour­nal­ist. Actu­ally there are enough jour­nal­ists and Heil’s pri­vate life does not attract many people.

In this week’s tweet this mix­ing is inherent:

Heil tells us that the mem­bers of the ger­man Bun­destag Rolf Mützenich and Niels Annen bought a skate­board and shoes dur­ing their visit and that they now can get back to work all together.

Is this a polit­i­cal infor­ma­tion or a pri­vate one? We do think it deals with pri­vate mat­ters of Mützenich and Annen. And for sure there will be jour­nal­ists to see this in a polit­i­cal con­text. Any­how, Heil does not make clear what rel­e­vance his tweets have and how they should be seen as.

Per­haps we should read Heil’s state­ments as the fol­low­ing tweet should be read, where he tells us how Obama should call his wife:

Bull­shit. [1]

So finally it turns out that the twit­ter ques­tion to Mr. Heil has to be posed more exactly: “What the fuck are you doing?”

__________________________________________________

[1] fol­low­ing Harry Frank­furt On bull­shit, Prince­ton Uni­ver­sity Press, 2005

Der japanische Zettelknicker

Es gibt derzeit einen japanisch-amerikanischen Insider. Die Amerikaner ver­ste­hen nicht die Inten­tion dieses kleinen, japanis­chen Video­clips, finden ihn aber lustig, was den ganzen Insider nun auch schon aus­macht. Hier mal das Original:

Was will uns dieser Japaner sagen? Ich würde ja eine neue Oscar-Kategorie vorschla­gen. Der Oscar für die ein­dringlich­ste neue Kör­per­hal­tungsaus­drucks­geste geht an.….

The schemer

This week’s tweet is not much about fun. It’s in a way just a state­ment. IKEA paid a guy to stay in a room where he’s being filmed all day. This was posted in quiet a few blogs already. And as Nils now turns out to be one of the top ger­man twit­ter users regard­ing counted fol­low­ers we had a short look at him.

You know, in the old days action artists did some­thing spe­cial. Some­times that was dis­turb­ing. And that kind of dis­tur­bance was the essence of their art.
The art of this guy is just to sit and wait. But not in the Sid­ney Young­blood man­ner. He’s just wait­ing in a room for the new IKEA cat­a­logue com­ing out in Sep­tem­ber and that’s all he does in August. And as the time runs out in August he tells us:

In the moment when he could really do some­thing spe­cial, a thing he could have pre­pared him­self for the last cou­ple of weeks, he is not able to present it in a way that does not leave every­one bored behind: “I hope the post­man brings the new IKEA cat­alouge. I’m really look­ing for­ward for try­ing out my new life.”

Boy, IKEA stuff is not for life. It’s for not spend­ing much money. If that is a top­per of your old life and the start­ing point of your new, we’ve really got no clue how sim­ple you are.

If this project was just a lit­tle bit more intel­li­gent maybe you could see some irony in it. For sure there are some guys in twit­ter, that sit before their com­puter the whole day. Seen that way this project could be a mir­ror to them. But how numb is it to say the solu­tion to that prob­lem was shopping?

This whole thing is an old idea with no new ele­ments and it deals only with min­i­mal­ism. A min­i­mal­ism that is sup­posed to be spe­cial due to not ful­fill­ing expec­ta­tions. Dear IKEA and Nils: We had none. And that’s going to be the essen­tial thing con­nected to you.

The clever doggie

If peo­ple on twit­ter don’t talk about them­selves or their prob­lems, they talk about news, tv, films, other peo­ple or ani­mals. If they talk about ani­mals, quite often they talk about their pets. And if they talk about pets then they talk about things they did wrong. You can hardly ever read a descrip­tion of a really right­ful done action of a pet. Or maybe that’s just my per­cep­tion. It just seems not to be too inter­est­ing to talk about that.

If twit­ter users do not talk about their pets, but about ani­mals, it’s about ani­mals in their envi­ron­ment not belong­ing to them. Brittt is one of them. It does not slip her atten­tion what and how ani­mals act that are near to her. So she writes:

The first thing I thought is some­thing, I sup­pose none of you thought. I thought: What a clever dog­gie. He comes into the room, rec­og­nizes that the win­dow is open, jumps upon the win­dowsill and does his busi­ness out­side for not soil­ing the room. Good boy!

Too sad a sec­ond later I thought that wasn’t Brittt’s story. She in a way wanted to tell that a dog was shit­ting out­side her house and that she could watch him doing his busi­ness. And the open win­dow seems to be a link to me that she even smelled that hap­pen­ing through her open window.

I don’t wanna care. I think my story is much more compelling.

The nothing

Ladies and Gents, this week’s tweet is THE tweet.

It’s the ulti­mate tweet.

It con­tains basics any twit­ter user uses. And it’s more. It’s art.
What kind of art it is, is what we need to find out.

So here’s what the tweet of the week is all about. Doomsham­mer says? Writes? Shows? This:

This is more than just a tweet. This is more than just play­ing a tiny tech­ni­cal game. This is a the­o­ret­i­cal and prac­ti­cal expres­sion of the nothing:

On the one hand you don’t find a sin­gle view­able sign to iden­tify.
On the other hand and as a result of the for­mer you don’t find any abstract infor­ma­tion within this tweet apart from the author’s name, the soft­ware he uses, the star and the time the tweet was made. If you want to talk about this tweet you are urged to refer to nothingness.

It was Mar­tin Hei­deg­ger claim­ing the noth­ing noths (“Das Nichts nichtet.”). You can object against Hei­deg­ger that his hardly under­stand­able usage of turn­ing nouns into verbs is not a pos­si­ble way to iden­tify truth. But this objec­tion could fail due to just reveal­ing your­self as being pig­headed. The mis­take of defin­ing how to iden­tify truth could lie in your own assump­tions. But with­out try­ing to glo­rify Hei­deg­ger we have to state that Doomsham­mer shows there’s still some­thing after the noth­ing has left.

Leave is defined by Hei­deg­ger with the following:

This is in eng­lish: “Leave is the absented arrival of the hid­ing of keep­ing the progress in the begin­ning.” So Doomsham­mers’ expres­sion is both the absence of any tweet con­tent and the begin­ning of any tweet.

So do not let Doomsham­mer fool you by link­ing to his own tweet as a tweet of emptiness:

You might still want to say, we’re miss­ing the point. We’re over-interpreting the whole tweet. We don’t have any inter­est­ing TMIs left and are urged to lift this up to one. Doomshammer’s just a nerd hav­ing fun with his iPhone.

So if that would be right our text would be TMI. If not we would have proven the incred­i­ble kind of art of this tweet.

We actu­ally think we can prove our thesis.

We can’t do this the­o­ret­i­cally but within prac­tise, within one of the artist’s tweet. Take a look at what Doomsham­mer threw like an unsat­is­fy­ing paint­ing into the trash bin just a sec­ond before reveal­ing his masterpiece:

The masturbation smiley

This week’s tweet is one you could have sus­pected as that kind of type this project would have started with. Talk­ing about infor­ma­tion that is just too much on twit­ter is mostly infor­ma­tion about sex­ual habits.
This is one of them and one that is quite compromised:

The sim­plic­ity of the mes­sage turns out to rise a lot of questions:

Does Tony really do that what he claims to do or is he just kid­ding? Is that an infor­ma­tion he really wants to share with oth­ers? What kind of profit would some­one else have with this infor­ma­tion? Is there no one within Tony’s world that feels uncom­fort­able with his?

Tony doesn’t seem to bother about those ques­tions. He even seems to be a rather relax­ing guy hav­ing the time to post a tweet while com­ing into action. But why is he adding a smi­ley to his post? Does he think: Well, you hadn’t expect I would really write this, he? Is he think­ing adding a smi­ley makes an action cool? Is the same con­tent bet­ter with­out a ref­er­ence to smil­ing (besides on the avatar) ?

Well, think about that. Or rather don’t :).

September 2008
Mo Di Mi Do Fr Sa So
« Aug   Okt »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  
Vor 5 Jahren